<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Class action roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/05/class-action-roundup-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/05/class-action-roundup-4/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 17:26:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: LTMG		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/05/class-action-roundup-4/comment-page-1/#comment-212956</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LTMG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 17:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=37683#comment-212956</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Regarding the Ford Explorer class action suit, is there any barrier to a judge requiring that an independent agency keep track of used coupons, then that agency remitting a percentage of the value of the used coupons to the plaintiff&#039;s attorneys?  The award to the attorneys is thus contingent upon consumers actually using coupons.  I can see to changed behaviors arising if this takes place.  First, no awards involving coupons for consumers.  Second, attorneys or their representatives energetically encouraging consumers to use their coupons.  The latter would put plaintiffs&#039; attorneys in the unusual position of advocating greater revenues for the defendant, and could well be a conflict of interest.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the Ford Explorer class action suit, is there any barrier to a judge requiring that an independent agency keep track of used coupons, then that agency remitting a percentage of the value of the used coupons to the plaintiff&#8217;s attorneys?  The award to the attorneys is thus contingent upon consumers actually using coupons.  I can see to changed behaviors arising if this takes place.  First, no awards involving coupons for consumers.  Second, attorneys or their representatives energetically encouraging consumers to use their coupons.  The latter would put plaintiffs&#8217; attorneys in the unusual position of advocating greater revenues for the defendant, and could well be a conflict of interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
