Comments on: N.Y. trial lawyers: bowling-shoe exemption must not stand https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/05/n-y-trial-lawyers-bowling-shoe-exemption-must-stand/ Chronicling the high cost of our legal system Fri, 07 Jun 2013 21:45:08 +0000 hourly 1 By: peter https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/05/n-y-trial-lawyers-bowling-shoe-exemption-must-stand/comment-page-1/#comment-215575 Fri, 24 May 2013 07:42:07 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=38637#comment-215575 But…but…but

Isn’t the best venue to decide liability for defective footwear tthat could easily be redesigned for only a few pence in front of a jury. Isn’t that so Ron?

]]> By: Hugo S. Cunningham https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/05/n-y-trial-lawyers-bowling-shoe-exemption-must-stand/comment-page-1/#comment-215385 Thu, 23 May 2013 14:43:44 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=38637#comment-215385 The tort absolutists may eventually get around to arguing that contracts are unconstitutional. After all, a contract amounts to giving up certain rights to sue. The fact that one gets something more valuable in exchange is irrelevant.

]]>