<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Maryland v. King: Scalia and the genetic panopticon	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/06/maryland-v-king-scalia-genetic-panopticon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/06/maryland-v-king-scalia-genetic-panopticon/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 05:30:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: June 21 roundup - Overlawyered		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/06/maryland-v-king-scalia-genetic-panopticon/comment-page-1/#comment-221206</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[June 21 roundup - Overlawyered]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 05:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=38920#comment-221206</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] into F.B.I. turf, local police are assembling databases of DNA records&#8221; [NYTimes, earlier here, here, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] into F.B.I. turf, local police are assembling databases of DNA records&#8221; [NYTimes, earlier here, here, and [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: When government Hoovers up information - Overlawyered		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/06/maryland-v-king-scalia-genetic-panopticon/comment-page-1/#comment-219434</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[When government Hoovers up information - Overlawyered]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 18:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=38920#comment-219434</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] the National Crime Information Center (NCIC), the FBI&#039;s electronic criminal-records database] Once DNA databases are open to varied queries from multiple law enforcement agencies, can we presume them [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] the National Crime Information Center (NCIC), the FBI&#039;s electronic criminal-records database] Once DNA databases are open to varied queries from multiple law enforcement agencies, can we presume them [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: More on Maryland v. King - Overlawyered		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/06/maryland-v-king-scalia-genetic-panopticon/comment-page-1/#comment-219086</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[More on Maryland v. King - Overlawyered]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jun 2013 16:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=38920#comment-219086</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] purposes writes itself.&#8221; [@andrewmgrossman] Michelle Meyer also has some ideas. Earlier here.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] purposes writes itself.&#8221; [@andrewmgrossman] Michelle Meyer also has some ideas. Earlier here.  [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ron Miller		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/06/maryland-v-king-scalia-genetic-panopticon/comment-page-1/#comment-218284</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Miller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 15:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=38920#comment-218284</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I support the majority - the conservatives, actually -  in this case.   I just don&#039;t think DNA in this context is all that invasive.  I think it is worth catching some more real bad guys.  I would not mind giving a DNA swab when I board a plane.  I don&#039;t see the efficacy of it.  But it seems like a small price to pay.   I think when you add up the suffering that is avoided by getting those bad guys off the street versus the level of the invasion... I don&#039;t think it is a close call. 

Sometimes, I think the knee jerk reaction is to feel that we are somehow becoming a police state because we are applying new technologies.  So the reaction is that any new invasion is too much.  I think each one can be weighed on its merits and I don&#039;t fear the slippery slope that many of you do.

Still, it warms my hear to see Scalia joining the liberals.  I love when justices seems to have independent voices of the issues of our day.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I support the majority &#8211; the conservatives, actually &#8211;  in this case.   I just don&#8217;t think DNA in this context is all that invasive.  I think it is worth catching some more real bad guys.  I would not mind giving a DNA swab when I board a plane.  I don&#8217;t see the efficacy of it.  But it seems like a small price to pay.   I think when you add up the suffering that is avoided by getting those bad guys off the street versus the level of the invasion&#8230; I don&#8217;t think it is a close call. </p>
<p>Sometimes, I think the knee jerk reaction is to feel that we are somehow becoming a police state because we are applying new technologies.  So the reaction is that any new invasion is too much.  I think each one can be weighed on its merits and I don&#8217;t fear the slippery slope that many of you do.</p>
<p>Still, it warms my hear to see Scalia joining the liberals.  I love when justices seems to have independent voices of the issues of our day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
