Comments on: Vance v. Ball State: the press miscoverage begins

By: Labor and employment roundup - Overlawyered

Labor and employment roundup - Overlawyered — Fri, 19 Jul 2013 04:30:06 +0000

[…] More on the implications of supervisory-harassment case Vance v. Ball State [Kay Steiger, The Atlantic, and thanks for mention; earlier here and here] […]

By: Walter Olson

Walter Olson — Thu, 27 Jun 2013 00:18:26 +0000

Porter Wright blog, by Sara Hutchins Jodka, here.

By: John Steele

John Steele — Wed, 26 Jun 2013 04:12:04 +0000

Walter, what struck me was the difference between the clarity of the lawyer-written blogs and the alarmism of most professor blogs and major media. But, to its credit, the Workplace Prof Blog noted, “Thus, the Court [SCOTUS] reaffirmed the agency principles it had adopted in Farragher and Ellerth.” For a succinct summary of the case from a working lawyer’s point of view, try the Porter Wright blog.

By: What the Supreme Court thinks of race | Kay Steiger

What the Supreme Court thinks of race | Kay Steiger — Tue, 25 Jun 2013 19:18:03 +0000

[…] therefore can’t argue the case as harassement in the way we typically think of it. (This blog argues that harassment can still argued, but must instead be argued as negligence on the part of […]