<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Law schools roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/07/law-schools-roundup-25/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/07/law-schools-roundup-25/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 16:59:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: wfjag		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/07/law-schools-roundup-25/comment-page-1/#comment-232195</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wfjag]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 16:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=40106#comment-232195</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Apparently some law schools teach the meaning of caveat emptor by personal experience.  See, MacDonald v. Thomas M. Cooley Law School, Nos. 12–2066, 12–2130, --- F.3d ----, 2013 WL 3880201 (6th Cir. July 30, 2013) (affirming motion to dismiss; plaintiff, law students, not covered by Michigan Consumer Protection law; law school was not liable under for fraudulent misrepresentation and law school was not liable for fraudulent concealment, since even if the representations misleading, materially incomplete or objectively untrue, law students could not and did not reasonably rely on representations of law school).

I suppose there are also legal ethics lessons provided the students, also.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently some law schools teach the meaning of caveat emptor by personal experience.  See, MacDonald v. Thomas M. Cooley Law School, Nos. 12–2066, 12–2130, &#8212; F.3d &#8212;-, 2013 WL 3880201 (6th Cir. July 30, 2013) (affirming motion to dismiss; plaintiff, law students, not covered by Michigan Consumer Protection law; law school was not liable under for fraudulent misrepresentation and law school was not liable for fraudulent concealment, since even if the representations misleading, materially incomplete or objectively untrue, law students could not and did not reasonably rely on representations of law school).</p>
<p>I suppose there are also legal ethics lessons provided the students, also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
