Comments on: “Jack in the Box ordered to pay St. Louis beating victim $20 M”

By: gasman

gasman — Tue, 17 Sep 2013 22:38:48 +0000

Jack in the Box was screwed from the start. The perpetrators were all black, so what do you think would have happened if J-Box had done anything in advance to break up the street party; they would have been bitch slapped with a racial discrimination suit instead.

http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/jack-in-the-box-ordered-to-pay-st-louis-beating/article_919a377e-f59c-526a-89b3-d0f4e2af7ffb.html

By: Mannie

Mannie — Tue, 17 Sep 2013 19:37:32 +0000

the partiers that administered the beating were 0% responsible for their own actions

They have the sovereign immunity from liability – no assets.

By: Titus

Titus — Tue, 17 Sep 2013 14:56:40 +0000

I am clearly doing something wrong in my practice.

By: captnhal

captnhal — Tue, 17 Sep 2013 13:41:21 +0000

Let me see if I got this right. Jack in the Box is 82% responsible, the victim is 18% responsible, and the partiers that administered the beating were 0% responsible for their own actions. What’s wrong with this picture?

By: John Burgess

John Burgess — Tue, 17 Sep 2013 10:56:14 +0000

Yep… if you’re a fast-food outlet serving late-night customers, you’ve got to have your own privatized SWAT team on contract to keep the parking lot in order. If not, you face legal consequences.

By: wfjag

wfjag — Tue, 17 Sep 2013 10:12:10 +0000

http://www.bettercallsaul.com/

(and you thought it was parody)