<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Undocumented = unmentionable?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/09/undocumented-unmentionable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/09/undocumented-unmentionable/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2013 18:14:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ron Miller		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/09/undocumented-unmentionable/comment-page-1/#comment-240050</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Miller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2013 18:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=41530#comment-240050</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Maybe it was the implying that he was stupid because of his immigration status. 

We seem to be saying two things on here.  Lawyers are running amok.  We need to get them under control. And then when we control one for saying something that was clearly intended to degrade the plaintiff by suggesting that he does not understand a court order (which I&#039;m sure his attorney explained), we complain about that]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it was the implying that he was stupid because of his immigration status. </p>
<p>We seem to be saying two things on here.  Lawyers are running amok.  We need to get them under control. And then when we control one for saying something that was clearly intended to degrade the plaintiff by suggesting that he does not understand a court order (which I&#8217;m sure his attorney explained), we complain about that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bumper		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/09/undocumented-unmentionable/comment-page-1/#comment-238580</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bumper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Sep 2013 02:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=41530#comment-238580</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So what have we learned here? 

Political correctness trumps a common sense interpretation of the English language and the Missouri plan is no better at selecting state supreme courts judges than elections.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what have we learned here? </p>
<p>Political correctness trumps a common sense interpretation of the English language and the Missouri plan is no better at selecting state supreme courts judges than elections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Robert		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/09/undocumented-unmentionable/comment-page-1/#comment-238566</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Sep 2013 17:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=41530#comment-238566</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The lawyer&#039;s statement was rather blunt, and could have used more &quot;tact.&quot; However a careful reading and parsing, shows no threats, and no discriminatory language.  I am surprised.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lawyer&#8217;s statement was rather blunt, and could have used more &#8220;tact.&#8221; However a careful reading and parsing, shows no threats, and no discriminatory language.  I am surprised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: prior probability		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/09/undocumented-unmentionable/comment-page-1/#comment-238559</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[prior probability]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Sep 2013 15:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=41530#comment-238559</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Does the term &quot;illegal alien&quot; appear in federal immigration laws? If so, could the Indiana Supreme Court&#039;s order be appealed to SCOTUS?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does the term &#8220;illegal alien&#8221; appear in federal immigration laws? If so, could the Indiana Supreme Court&#8217;s order be appealed to SCOTUS?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
