<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Labor and employment roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/10/labor-employment-roundup-18/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/10/labor-employment-roundup-18/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2013 04:30:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Going to the press with an employment dispute = &#34;retaliation&#34;? - Overlawyered		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/10/labor-employment-roundup-18/comment-page-1/#comment-241922</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Going to the press with an employment dispute = &#34;retaliation&#34;? - Overlawyered]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2013 04:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=41774#comment-241922</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] &#8220;Did the law firm [Ropes &#038; Gray] retaliate against John Ray III by providing information about his Equal Employment Opportunity Commission race-discrimination complaint to the Above the Law blog?&#8221; That is among the questions a federal court in Boston will consider in a trial beginning next month. Specifically, the firm sent a copy of the EEOC&#8217;s determination letter in Ray&#8217;s case to the popular blog. Since no law bars &#8220;retaliation&#8221; by employees against employers, we might arrive at a situation in which an employee is free to try his case in the press, while an employer&#8217;s hands are tied against responding in kind. [ABA Journal; earlier] [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] &#8220;Did the law firm [Ropes &amp; Gray] retaliate against John Ray III by providing information about his Equal Employment Opportunity Commission race-discrimination complaint to the Above the Law blog?&#8221; That is among the questions a federal court in Boston will consider in a trial beginning next month. Specifically, the firm sent a copy of the EEOC&#8217;s determination letter in Ray&#8217;s case to the popular blog. Since no law bars &#8220;retaliation&#8221; by employees against employers, we might arrive at a situation in which an employee is free to try his case in the press, while an employer&#8217;s hands are tied against responding in kind. [ABA Journal; earlier] [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
