<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: &#8220;You Didn&#8217;t Pay Child Support? We&#8217;ll Make it Harder for You to Work&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/11/didnt-pay-child-support-well-make-harder-work/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/11/didnt-pay-child-support-well-make-harder-work/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Nov 2013 05:15:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Hugo S. Cunningham		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/11/didnt-pay-child-support-well-make-harder-work/comment-page-1/#comment-250172</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hugo S. Cunningham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Nov 2013 05:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=42517#comment-250172</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In addition to the debtors&#039; prison argument raised by the student, there is also the devaluation of license-suspension as a sanction against dangerous driving.  In a community where license-suspension is widely viewed as capricious, the unsafe driver will feel less inhibition about continuing to drive (and endangering the public) despite a suspended license.

On a related question, I have opposed car seizures for minor non-safety related offenses like cruising for prostitutes, largely on Eight Amendment grounds (&quot;excessive fine&quot;).  AS a test of good faith, I would require communities wanting to institute non-safety seizures to demonstrate, in interests of proportionality, that they already were seizing cars of drivers using a license suspended for *safety* reasons (and only safety reasons).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In addition to the debtors&#8217; prison argument raised by the student, there is also the devaluation of license-suspension as a sanction against dangerous driving.  In a community where license-suspension is widely viewed as capricious, the unsafe driver will feel less inhibition about continuing to drive (and endangering the public) despite a suspended license.</p>
<p>On a related question, I have opposed car seizures for minor non-safety related offenses like cruising for prostitutes, largely on Eight Amendment grounds (&#8220;excessive fine&#8221;).  AS a test of good faith, I would require communities wanting to institute non-safety seizures to demonstrate, in interests of proportionality, that they already were seizing cars of drivers using a license suspended for *safety* reasons (and only safety reasons).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: great unknown		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/11/didnt-pay-child-support-well-make-harder-work/comment-page-1/#comment-250033</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[great unknown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2013 13:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=42517#comment-250033</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Isn&#039;t &quot;vehicle for sentimental vengefulness&quot; a concise description of Family Court?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t &#8220;vehicle for sentimental vengefulness&#8221; a concise description of Family Court?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
