<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Massachusetts alimony reform, a year later	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/11/massachusetts-alimony-reform-year-later/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/11/massachusetts-alimony-reform-year-later/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2013 12:41:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom Leustek		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/11/massachusetts-alimony-reform-year-later/comment-page-1/#comment-246376</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Leustek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2013 12:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=42323#comment-246376</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Hoped-for panacea&quot; is rather strong language. Who exactly was hoping for a panacea? More realistically, &quot;a clear improvement&quot; is the best that could have been hoped for and more accurately describes the true expectations of those involved in creating the Alimony Reform Act 2011. Alimony is a deeply entrenched part of some societies, with individual biases and preconceptions abounding, and a powerful opportunity for the legal class to harvest money from the productive class. I doubt that anyone was hoping for a &quot;panacea&quot;. But most everyone is happy with a &quot;clear improvement&quot; for the time being. Those affected by antiquated concepts of lifetime alimony need to be vigilant. It will take long-term pressure to right a system that detests change.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Hoped-for panacea&#8221; is rather strong language. Who exactly was hoping for a panacea? More realistically, &#8220;a clear improvement&#8221; is the best that could have been hoped for and more accurately describes the true expectations of those involved in creating the Alimony Reform Act 2011. Alimony is a deeply entrenched part of some societies, with individual biases and preconceptions abounding, and a powerful opportunity for the legal class to harvest money from the productive class. I doubt that anyone was hoping for a &#8220;panacea&#8221;. But most everyone is happy with a &#8220;clear improvement&#8221; for the time being. Those affected by antiquated concepts of lifetime alimony need to be vigilant. It will take long-term pressure to right a system that detests change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
