<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: &#8220;Why did New Yorkers decline — by a huge 61 to 39% margin — to end age discrimination against judges?&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/11/new-yorkers-decline-huge-61-39-margin-end-age-discrimination-judges/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/11/new-yorkers-decline-huge-61-39-margin-end-age-discrimination-judges/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 23:33:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Tex Judge		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/11/new-yorkers-decline-huge-61-39-margin-end-age-discrimination-judges/comment-page-1/#comment-251096</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tex Judge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 23:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=42519#comment-251096</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In Texas we can get rid of judges who mess up or are no longer able to handle the burdens of the job because all judges are elected and have terms of 4 years (6 years for appellate judges). Contrast that to states like New York or Mass. where judges have, effectively, life tenure and there are only three ways to get rid of them: death, voluntary retirement or attaining the mandatory retirement age. Also, there are no term limits in those states. A mandatory retirement age of, say, 70 or 75 is reasonable and, if you don&#039;t like it, then don&#039;t accept a judgeship.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Texas we can get rid of judges who mess up or are no longer able to handle the burdens of the job because all judges are elected and have terms of 4 years (6 years for appellate judges). Contrast that to states like New York or Mass. where judges have, effectively, life tenure and there are only three ways to get rid of them: death, voluntary retirement or attaining the mandatory retirement age. Also, there are no term limits in those states. A mandatory retirement age of, say, 70 or 75 is reasonable and, if you don&#8217;t like it, then don&#8217;t accept a judgeship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Michael J Katz MD		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/11/new-yorkers-decline-huge-61-39-margin-end-age-discrimination-judges/comment-page-1/#comment-250708</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael J Katz MD]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2013 03:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=42519#comment-250708</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I hope that you are aware that this piece is hysterically funny. The expert that you quoted on judicial age discrimination is named Althouse. In German this means, &quot;Old House&quot;.

Best Regards,


Michael J. Katz MD]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope that you are aware that this piece is hysterically funny. The expert that you quoted on judicial age discrimination is named Althouse. In German this means, &#8220;Old House&#8221;.</p>
<p>Best Regards,</p>
<p>Michael J. Katz MD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Old Judges, Bad Judges &#124; Simple Justice		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/11/new-yorkers-decline-huge-61-39-margin-end-age-discrimination-judges/comment-page-1/#comment-250372</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Old Judges, Bad Judges &#124; Simple Justice]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Nov 2013 11:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=42519#comment-250372</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Wally Olson at Overlawyered brought a post by Angry Blond lawprof Ann Althouse to the fore, which cast a disturbing light on [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Wally Olson at Overlawyered brought a post by Angry Blond lawprof Ann Althouse to the fore, which cast a disturbing light on [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Go Away, Old Judges &#124; Simple Justice		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/11/new-yorkers-decline-huge-61-39-margin-end-age-discrimination-judges/comment-page-1/#comment-250369</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Go Away, Old Judges &#124; Simple Justice]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Nov 2013 11:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=42519#comment-250369</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Wally Olson at Overlawyered brought a post by Angry Blond lawprof Ann Althouse to the fore, which cast a disturbing light on [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Wally Olson at Overlawyered brought a post by Angry Blond lawprof Ann Althouse to the fore, which cast a disturbing light on [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JOHN		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/11/new-yorkers-decline-huge-61-39-margin-end-age-discrimination-judges/comment-page-1/#comment-250242</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JOHN]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Nov 2013 16:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=42519#comment-250242</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[NY Judges &quot;retire&quot; at 70 and then are allowed to request up to 3 2-year &quot;extensions&quot; which are routinely granted. To &quot;force&quot; someone to retire at 76 seems pretty reasonable, especially given that there are still plenty of other ways a vital 76 year old person can contribute his/her talents to society.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NY Judges &#8220;retire&#8221; at 70 and then are allowed to request up to 3 2-year &#8220;extensions&#8221; which are routinely granted. To &#8220;force&#8221; someone to retire at 76 seems pretty reasonable, especially given that there are still plenty of other ways a vital 76 year old person can contribute his/her talents to society.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ron Miller		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/11/new-yorkers-decline-huge-61-39-margin-end-age-discrimination-judges/comment-page-1/#comment-250068</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Miller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2013 16:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=42519#comment-250068</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Maryland I think takes a smart approach.  You are required to resign at 70.   But you can come right back as a visiting judge until you are 120.   

It is a clear end run around the law but a practical one.  It is easier to dump a visiting judge who is not up to snuff.  But in 2013, there are a lot of very productive judges in their 80s and we want to tap into that knowledge and experience.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maryland I think takes a smart approach.  You are required to resign at 70.   But you can come right back as a visiting judge until you are 120.   </p>
<p>It is a clear end run around the law but a practical one.  It is easier to dump a visiting judge who is not up to snuff.  But in 2013, there are a lot of very productive judges in their 80s and we want to tap into that knowledge and experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
