<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Update: Oz high court reverses sex-injury comp award	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/11/update-oz-high-court-reverses-sex-injury-comp-award/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/11/update-oz-high-court-reverses-sex-injury-comp-award/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Nov 2013 22:03:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Malcolm		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/11/update-oz-high-court-reverses-sex-injury-comp-award/comment-page-1/#comment-245642</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Malcolm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Nov 2013 22:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=42229#comment-245642</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This story has be titillating us for a long time here in Australia. I can&#039;t imagine anybody except a lawyer who would disagree with the Hogh Court&#039;s decision in this case.
However, to answer Boblipton&#039;s query, the High Court is capable of examining the evidence, but usually, by the time an appeal reaches it, the facts of a case are agreed upon by both parties, and only issues of law are involved.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This story has be titillating us for a long time here in Australia. I can&#8217;t imagine anybody except a lawyer who would disagree with the Hogh Court&#8217;s decision in this case.<br />
However, to answer Boblipton&#8217;s query, the High Court is capable of examining the evidence, but usually, by the time an appeal reaches it, the facts of a case are agreed upon by both parties, and only issues of law are involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Boblipton		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/11/update-oz-high-court-reverses-sex-injury-comp-award/comment-page-1/#comment-245346</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boblipton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Nov 2013 13:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=42229#comment-245346</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This article raises the question of whether the Australian High Court rules only on matters of law or if they also examine the evidence.

Bob]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article raises the question of whether the Australian High Court rules only on matters of law or if they also examine the evidence.</p>
<p>Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
