<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Washington Post on Medicare eye drugs	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/12/washington-post-two-eye-drugs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/12/washington-post-two-eye-drugs/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Dec 2013 00:56:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: HFB		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/12/washington-post-two-eye-drugs/comment-page-1/#comment-256324</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[HFB]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Dec 2013 21:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=43052#comment-256324</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It’s off-label because “the company has refused encouragement from the FDA to seek official approval for using it to treat eye ailments.”

LOL

I.E.  &quot;Please pay us to get this approved...through us....by us...whatever.  Just pay a bunch of money to someone (don&#039;t forget us!) to get this through.&quot;  Sheesh!  Won&#039;t someone think of the children?!?!?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s off-label because “the company has refused encouragement from the FDA to seek official approval for using it to treat eye ailments.”</p>
<p>LOL</p>
<p>I.E.  &#8220;Please pay us to get this approved&#8230;through us&#8230;.by us&#8230;whatever.  Just pay a bunch of money to someone (don&#8217;t forget us!) to get this through.&#8221;  Sheesh!  Won&#8217;t someone think of the children?!?!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: DensityDuck		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/12/washington-post-two-eye-drugs/comment-page-1/#comment-255355</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DensityDuck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2013 06:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=43052#comment-255355</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;It’s off-label because “the company has refused encouragement from the FDA to seek official approval for using it to treat eye ailments.” &quot;

Hardly surprising.  Remember colchicine?  (Look it up if you don&#039;t.)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It’s off-label because “the company has refused encouragement from the FDA to seek official approval for using it to treat eye ailments.” &#8221;</p>
<p>Hardly surprising.  Remember colchicine?  (Look it up if you don&#8217;t.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Max Kennerly		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/12/washington-post-two-eye-drugs/comment-page-1/#comment-255348</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Max Kennerly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2013 04:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=43052#comment-255348</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s off-label because &quot;the company has refused encouragement from the FDA to seek official approval for using it to treat eye ailments.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s off-label because &#8220;the company has refused encouragement from the FDA to seek official approval for using it to treat eye ailments.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: DEM		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/12/washington-post-two-eye-drugs/comment-page-1/#comment-255258</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DEM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2013 15:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=43052#comment-255258</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Post wants a government win-win here, doesn&#039;t it?  I.e., save money by prescribing Avastin off-label, then have the DOJ sue Genetech into oblivion for off-label marketing, resulting (as awlays) in a massive settlement benefitting federal coffers.  Heads the government wins, tails Genetech loses.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Post wants a government win-win here, doesn&#8217;t it?  I.e., save money by prescribing Avastin off-label, then have the DOJ sue Genetech into oblivion for off-label marketing, resulting (as awlays) in a massive settlement benefitting federal coffers.  Heads the government wins, tails Genetech loses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/12/washington-post-two-eye-drugs/comment-page-1/#comment-255256</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2013 14:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=43052#comment-255256</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[See, this is why we need JournoList. These creatures need a forum where they can dialogue and get their stories straight before publication.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See, this is why we need JournoList. These creatures need a forum where they can dialogue and get their stories straight before publication.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mannie		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/12/washington-post-two-eye-drugs/comment-page-1/#comment-255255</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mannie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2013 14:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=43052#comment-255255</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[How much more risk of a ruinous malpractice suit is there for prescribing off label &quot;Rogue Drugs.&quot;  You can almost hear the malpractice lawyer denouncing this &quot;reckless practice only intended to save the evil insurance companies some money.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much more risk of a ruinous malpractice suit is there for prescribing off label &#8220;Rogue Drugs.&#8221;  You can almost hear the malpractice lawyer denouncing this &#8220;reckless practice only intended to save the evil insurance companies some money.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Larry Sheldon		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/12/washington-post-two-eye-drugs/comment-page-1/#comment-255243</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Larry Sheldon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2013 11:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=43052#comment-255243</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Does this say that the big-government libs are saying that the doctors should disregard big-government pronouncements?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this say that the big-government libs are saying that the doctors should disregard big-government pronouncements?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
