<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Candy Crush Saga trademark claims	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/01/candy-crush-saga-trademark-claims/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/01/candy-crush-saga-trademark-claims/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2014 07:30:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Alan K. Henderson		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/01/candy-crush-saga-trademark-claims/comment-page-1/#comment-264479</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan K. Henderson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2014 07:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=43609#comment-264479</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Would a &quot;Lawyer Crush&quot; arcade game be litigation-safe?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would a &#8220;Lawyer Crush&#8221; arcade game be litigation-safe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Doug		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/01/candy-crush-saga-trademark-claims/comment-page-1/#comment-263959</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2014 23:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=43609#comment-263959</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Its overly broad.  Look for a fight.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its overly broad.  Look for a fight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: DensityDuck		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/01/candy-crush-saga-trademark-claims/comment-page-1/#comment-263804</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DensityDuck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2014 15:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=43609#comment-263804</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[On the other hand, they do have a point.  There&#039;s about a billion cheap Chinese-knockoff copycat apps named &quot;Candy something-or-other&quot;, &quot;this-or-that Saga&quot;, and they clearly *are* trying to ride the coattails of the original game&#039;s success.

And my understanding of trademark law (and enforcement practice) is that if you don&#039;t prosecute aggressively, you might as well not bother.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the other hand, they do have a point.  There&#8217;s about a billion cheap Chinese-knockoff copycat apps named &#8220;Candy something-or-other&#8221;, &#8220;this-or-that Saga&#8221;, and they clearly *are* trying to ride the coattails of the original game&#8217;s success.</p>
<p>And my understanding of trademark law (and enforcement practice) is that if you don&#8217;t prosecute aggressively, you might as well not bother.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
