<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Claim: resort&#8217;s ban on snowboards violates constitutional rights	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/01/claim-resorts-ban-snowboards-violates-constitutional-rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/01/claim-resorts-ban-snowboards-violates-constitutional-rights/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2014 16:55:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: No Name Guy		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/01/claim-resorts-ban-snowboards-violates-constitutional-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-262967</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[No Name Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2014 16:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=43541#comment-262967</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Heck, I want to sled, disc or tube down the slopes.  How DARE they ban the &quot;type&quot; of people that like to sled or tube ( lower economic class folks with chewing tobacco hats on) or gasp.....families with small children.  /snark

Or perhaps, could it be an incompatible style of usage of the slopes e.g. on AVERAGE  the very nature of snowboards encourage a style of sliding down the hill that is dangerous to other users.  As the too many people who engage in this encouraged dangerous style of sliding down the hill can&#039;t be discerned from the responsible boarders, those that don&#039;t fall for the lure of dangerous sliding down the hill, the only way to make the slopes less dangerous is to ban all boards.  Hmmmm.... the same reason that discs, tubes and sleds aren&#039;t allowed on the ski slopes.  Go figure.

Just because you want to use something your particular way, doesn&#039;t mean its your right to do so.  I would suggest those snowboarders get skis if they want to enjoy Alta.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heck, I want to sled, disc or tube down the slopes.  How DARE they ban the &#8220;type&#8221; of people that like to sled or tube ( lower economic class folks with chewing tobacco hats on) or gasp&#8230;..families with small children.  /snark</p>
<p>Or perhaps, could it be an incompatible style of usage of the slopes e.g. on AVERAGE  the very nature of snowboards encourage a style of sliding down the hill that is dangerous to other users.  As the too many people who engage in this encouraged dangerous style of sliding down the hill can&#8217;t be discerned from the responsible boarders, those that don&#8217;t fall for the lure of dangerous sliding down the hill, the only way to make the slopes less dangerous is to ban all boards.  Hmmmm&#8230;. the same reason that discs, tubes and sleds aren&#8217;t allowed on the ski slopes.  Go figure.</p>
<p>Just because you want to use something your particular way, doesn&#8217;t mean its your right to do so.  I would suggest those snowboarders get skis if they want to enjoy Alta.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: wfjag		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/01/claim-resorts-ban-snowboards-violates-constitutional-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-262957</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wfjag]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2014 16:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=43541#comment-262957</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I must have missed the Con Law class which covered the subject that people who use the word &quot;gnarly&quot; are a suspect category.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must have missed the Con Law class which covered the subject that people who use the word &#8220;gnarly&#8221; are a suspect category.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John Fembup		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/01/claim-resorts-ban-snowboards-violates-constitutional-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-262550</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Fembup]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2014 23:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=43541#comment-262550</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;is on public land&quot;

Understood, but does it then matter whether Alta is a government business or a private business?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;is on public land&#8221;</p>
<p>Understood, but does it then matter whether Alta is a government business or a private business?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: common sense		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/01/claim-resorts-ban-snowboards-violates-constitutional-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-262521</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[common sense]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2014 21:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=43541#comment-262521</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[because they should be allowed on public land. wait, aren&#039;t military bases[ even area 51] government building, the white house etc on public lands? let&#039;s not have any restrictions, after we all have paid for htese and all need eqaul access.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>because they should be allowed on public land. wait, aren&#8217;t military bases[ even area 51] government building, the white house etc on public lands? let&#8217;s not have any restrictions, after we all have paid for htese and all need eqaul access.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jazzizhep		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/01/claim-resorts-ban-snowboards-violates-constitutional-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-262501</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jazzizhep]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2014 19:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=43541#comment-262501</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Interesting lawsuit since the resort operates on public land. Can a litigants choices (e.g. preference for snowboards) be protected under anti-discrimination statutes? What if nudists wish to ski at the resort (count me out because of the shrinkage factor)?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting lawsuit since the resort operates on public land. Can a litigants choices (e.g. preference for snowboards) be protected under anti-discrimination statutes? What if nudists wish to ski at the resort (count me out because of the shrinkage factor)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: delurking		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/01/claim-resorts-ban-snowboards-violates-constitutional-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-262478</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[delurking]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2014 18:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=43541#comment-262478</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m going to sue because they won&#039;t let me snowmobile there.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to sue because they won&#8217;t let me snowmobile there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
