<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: &#8220;Dubious achievements in privacy law&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/01/dubious-achievements-privacy-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/01/dubious-achievements-privacy-law/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 21:54:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Hugo S. Cunningham		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/01/dubious-achievements-privacy-law/comment-page-1/#comment-259130</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hugo S. Cunningham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 21:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=43296#comment-259130</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I supported the original invasion-of-privacy lawsuit by Max Mosley against the dirt-ball British tabloid which helped set up the orgy they reported on.  I generally oppose lawsuits against Google for reporting what is out there, however.  Better might be an open tab on the dirt-ball tabloid-- open liability to be paid for each year that their Mosley story continues to attract significant Internet interest. Give them an incentive to try to relegate it to obscurity.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I supported the original invasion-of-privacy lawsuit by Max Mosley against the dirt-ball British tabloid which helped set up the orgy they reported on.  I generally oppose lawsuits against Google for reporting what is out there, however.  Better might be an open tab on the dirt-ball tabloid&#8211; open liability to be paid for each year that their Mosley story continues to attract significant Internet interest. Give them an incentive to try to relegate it to obscurity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: MattS		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/01/dubious-achievements-privacy-law/comment-page-1/#comment-258638</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MattS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2014 04:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=43296#comment-258638</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Mr Baker is a statist that is likely just looking to discredit the very idea of privacy.  Fooled me for a while too when he first started posting this nonsense at http://www.volokh.com/.  Go read some of his defenses of the NSA there and you&#039;ll see what I mean.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr Baker is a statist that is likely just looking to discredit the very idea of privacy.  Fooled me for a while too when he first started posting this nonsense at <a href="http://www.volokh.com/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.volokh.com/</a>.  Go read some of his defenses of the NSA there and you&#8217;ll see what I mean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
