<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Supreme Court on civil procedure: calm and unanimous	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/01/supreme-court-civil-procedure-calm-unanimous/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/01/supreme-court-civil-procedure-calm-unanimous/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2016 17:53:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jerry Vandesic		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/01/supreme-court-civil-procedure-calm-unanimous/comment-page-1/#comment-260194</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jerry Vandesic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2014 19:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=43463#comment-260194</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ignoring the merits of the decision, I don&#039;t see a contradiction between &quot;unanimous&quot; and &quot;wholly owned subsidary.&quot;   Wholly aligns well with unanimous.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ignoring the merits of the decision, I don&#8217;t see a contradiction between &#8220;unanimous&#8221; and &#8220;wholly owned subsidary.&#8221;   Wholly aligns well with unanimous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
