<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Voucherizing indigent criminal defense	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/01/voucherizing-indigent-criminal-defense/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/01/voucherizing-indigent-criminal-defense/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Jan 2014 23:55:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: nl7		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/01/voucherizing-indigent-criminal-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-259248</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nl7]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2014 14:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=43361#comment-259248</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Will put pressure on how to adjust the eligibility cutoffs, since the subsidy frees defendants from using attorneys they consider less effective.  Will probably involve a phaseout as income rises rather than cutting an equal check for every defendant.

It&#039;s not crazy to make the jurisdiction pay for some of the defense costs of every prosecution it follows (especially if increased costs reduce zealous over-prosecution) but it would be very unpopular to hand over checks to the best-paid lawyers in equal amount to lawyers defending the indigent.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will put pressure on how to adjust the eligibility cutoffs, since the subsidy frees defendants from using attorneys they consider less effective.  Will probably involve a phaseout as income rises rather than cutting an equal check for every defendant.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not crazy to make the jurisdiction pay for some of the defense costs of every prosecution it follows (especially if increased costs reduce zealous over-prosecution) but it would be very unpopular to hand over checks to the best-paid lawyers in equal amount to lawyers defending the indigent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
