<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: &#8220;Creeping sharia&#8221; in American law?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/02/creeping-sharia-us-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/02/creeping-sharia-us-law/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 14:55:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Walter Olson		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/02/creeping-sharia-us-law/comment-page-1/#comment-269180</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 14:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=44100#comment-269180</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[These are complicated issues and on some of them more than one position can claim a plausible libertarian-classical liberal basis. Volokh makes a strong case that we can be comfortable on a practical as well as a constitutional level with recognizing for Islamic believers the same rights as are enjoyed by believers in all other systems. I think his analysis is particularly incisive on questions of accommodation in government services (if schools close for Christmas, must they also close for holidays of other religions? Is it improper for a city-run airport to designate prayer or ablutional space for devout taxi drivers? Etc.)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are complicated issues and on some of them more than one position can claim a plausible libertarian-classical liberal basis. Volokh makes a strong case that we can be comfortable on a practical as well as a constitutional level with recognizing for Islamic believers the same rights as are enjoyed by believers in all other systems. I think his analysis is particularly incisive on questions of accommodation in government services (if schools close for Christmas, must they also close for holidays of other religions? Is it improper for a city-run airport to designate prayer or ablutional space for devout taxi drivers? Etc.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
