<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc.: SCOTUS considers shareholder class actions	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/03/halliburton-co-v-erica-p-john-fund-inc-scotus-considers-shareholder-class-actions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/03/halliburton-co-v-erica-p-john-fund-inc-scotus-considers-shareholder-class-actions/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2014 18:51:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous Attorney		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/03/halliburton-co-v-erica-p-john-fund-inc-scotus-considers-shareholder-class-actions/comment-page-1/#comment-270927</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Attorney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2014 18:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=44390#comment-270927</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Shareholder class actions are nothing but high-class trip-and-fall suits:  they&#039;re opportunistic, grossly exaggerate harms, exact costs that far exceed any benefit conferred - assuming there is any benefit, and are pursued by the bottom-feeders of the legal profession.  Limits on the enterprise would be welcome.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shareholder class actions are nothing but high-class trip-and-fall suits:  they&#8217;re opportunistic, grossly exaggerate harms, exact costs that far exceed any benefit conferred &#8211; assuming there is any benefit, and are pursued by the bottom-feeders of the legal profession.  Limits on the enterprise would be welcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
