<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: An expensive night&#8217;s entertainment	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/04/expensive-nights-entertainment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/04/expensive-nights-entertainment/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 20:49:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: D		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/04/expensive-nights-entertainment/comment-page-1/#comment-277923</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[D]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 20:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=45087#comment-277923</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Wait. This was a bar band. Isn&#039;t their performance covered under parody laws?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait. This was a bar band. Isn&#8217;t their performance covered under parody laws?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Eric Johnson		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/04/expensive-nights-entertainment/comment-page-1/#comment-277749</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Johnson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 02:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=45087#comment-277749</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@Jim Collins

No. It&#039;s the responsibility of the venue. See ASCAP&#039;s FAQ:
http://www.ascap.com/licensing/licensingfaq.aspx#general]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jim Collins</p>
<p>No. It&#8217;s the responsibility of the venue. See ASCAP&#8217;s FAQ:<br />
<a href="http://www.ascap.com/licensing/licensingfaq.aspx#general" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.ascap.com/licensing/licensingfaq.aspx#general</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Parkhorse		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/04/expensive-nights-entertainment/comment-page-1/#comment-277727</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Parkhorse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 00:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=45087#comment-277727</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@Jim: entirely possible the band has next to no assets. The bar owner, on the other hand, owns a bar. The choice of who to sue is obvious.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jim: entirely possible the band has next to no assets. The bar owner, on the other hand, owns a bar. The choice of who to sue is obvious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bumper		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/04/expensive-nights-entertainment/comment-page-1/#comment-277648</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bumper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2014 17:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=45087#comment-277648</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Because bar bands have no money, that&#039;s why they are still a bar band, and moving circularly; they don&#039;t have their act together, i.e., no or not enough original material, which is why they play other people&#039;s songs.

Note: Even the Beatles played cover songs, they just had better lawyers and that was a long time ago when life (the law) was easier.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because bar bands have no money, that&#8217;s why they are still a bar band, and moving circularly; they don&#8217;t have their act together, i.e., no or not enough original material, which is why they play other people&#8217;s songs.</p>
<p>Note: Even the Beatles played cover songs, they just had better lawyers and that was a long time ago when life (the law) was easier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jim Collins		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/04/expensive-nights-entertainment/comment-page-1/#comment-277601</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Collins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2014 13:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=45087#comment-277601</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Why sue the bar?  Sue the band.  Isn&#039;t it the band&#039;s obligation to take care of this?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why sue the bar?  Sue the band.  Isn&#8217;t it the band&#8217;s obligation to take care of this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ras		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/04/expensive-nights-entertainment/comment-page-1/#comment-277459</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ras]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2014 21:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=45087#comment-277459</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If nobody wants your current product, you gotta try to make the old stuff pay more somehow.

I predict an eventual upsurge in something akin to the free software approach, whereby music will be licensed free by independent musicians looking to gain recognition, and played widely as a result. Anything&#039;s better than the crap the industry foists on us these days.

/and get off my lawn, too!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If nobody wants your current product, you gotta try to make the old stuff pay more somehow.</p>
<p>I predict an eventual upsurge in something akin to the free software approach, whereby music will be licensed free by independent musicians looking to gain recognition, and played widely as a result. Anything&#8217;s better than the crap the industry foists on us these days.</p>
<p>/and get off my lawn, too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: asdfasdf		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/04/expensive-nights-entertainment/comment-page-1/#comment-277446</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[asdfasdf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2014 19:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=45087#comment-277446</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The lawsuit filing is here:http://www.onstagemagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/BMIvs69Taps.pdf .

The suit does not ask for $1.5 million dollars. It asks for statutory damages, which the accompanying article calculated could be &quot;up to&quot; that amount.

The suit to me looks completely justified. The bar is getting direct financial benefit by playing copyrighted songs without paying the rights holders. Presumably, the bar refused to settle. 

Songwriters deserve money when someone makes a profit off their work. If the bar didn&#039;t want to compensate the creators of the work, it shouldn&#039;t have played their songs for money.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lawsuit filing is here:<a href="http://www.onstagemagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/BMIvs69Taps.pdf" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.onstagemagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/BMIvs69Taps.pdf</a> .</p>
<p>The suit does not ask for $1.5 million dollars. It asks for statutory damages, which the accompanying article calculated could be &#8220;up to&#8221; that amount.</p>
<p>The suit to me looks completely justified. The bar is getting direct financial benefit by playing copyrighted songs without paying the rights holders. Presumably, the bar refused to settle. </p>
<p>Songwriters deserve money when someone makes a profit off their work. If the bar didn&#8217;t want to compensate the creators of the work, it shouldn&#8217;t have played their songs for money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
