<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Immediate SLAPP-ruling appealability	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/04/immediate-slapp-ruling-appealability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/04/immediate-slapp-ruling-appealability/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 03:41:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Hugo S Cunningham		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/04/immediate-slapp-ruling-appealability/comment-page-1/#comment-282276</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hugo S Cunningham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 03:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=45527#comment-282276</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The most effective anti-SLAPP law would establish a norm the a losing libel plaintiff pays the defendant&#039;s legal costs.  The reverse should *not* apply.  In frivolous cases, the judge or jury could make the plaintiff and his lawyer jointly and severally liable for double or triple costs.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most effective anti-SLAPP law would establish a norm the a losing libel plaintiff pays the defendant&#8217;s legal costs.  The reverse should *not* apply.  In frivolous cases, the judge or jury could make the plaintiff and his lawyer jointly and severally liable for double or triple costs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
