<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: California ADA claims, cont&#8217;d	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/04/nbc-affiliate-california-ada-claims/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/04/nbc-affiliate-california-ada-claims/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 21:35:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike G		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/04/nbc-affiliate-california-ada-claims/comment-page-1/#comment-276769</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike G]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 21:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=44948#comment-276769</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Chris,

Having represented a handful of small business owners in cases alleging ADA violations and violations of California&#039;s disability access laws, unfortunately that is not a defense.  In fact, under California&#039;s parallel statute, an argument that the violation is &quot;de minimis&quot; is expressly excluded.  Further, because of the statutorily set damages, and attorneys&#039; fee shifting provisions, attempting to defend such suits comes with a massive risk.  There are a handful of individuals who are fairly well known in Northern California who are professional plaintiffs.  One in particular (who has been a plaintiff in well over 300 filed cases, usually against small, family owned restaurants) is confined to a wheelchair and goes into as many businesses as he can per day with his camera, tape measure, and check list of what to measure.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p>Having represented a handful of small business owners in cases alleging ADA violations and violations of California&#8217;s disability access laws, unfortunately that is not a defense.  In fact, under California&#8217;s parallel statute, an argument that the violation is &#8220;de minimis&#8221; is expressly excluded.  Further, because of the statutorily set damages, and attorneys&#8217; fee shifting provisions, attempting to defend such suits comes with a massive risk.  There are a handful of individuals who are fairly well known in Northern California who are professional plaintiffs.  One in particular (who has been a plaintiff in well over 300 filed cases, usually against small, family owned restaurants) is confined to a wheelchair and goes into as many businesses as he can per day with his camera, tape measure, and check list of what to measure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris Hoey		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/04/nbc-affiliate-california-ada-claims/comment-page-1/#comment-276721</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Hoey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 17:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=44948#comment-276721</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Someone should use “De minimis non curat lex” to kill 99% of these claims.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone should use “De minimis non curat lex” to kill 99% of these claims.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jazzizhep		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/04/nbc-affiliate-california-ada-claims/comment-page-1/#comment-276510</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jazzizhep]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 12:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=44948#comment-276510</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Incorrect color of blue on sign
Incorrect shape of sign
Wrong color barriers in parking lot
Incorrect mirror height 

We have fallen through a Kafkaesque rabbit hole.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incorrect color of blue on sign<br />
Incorrect shape of sign<br />
Wrong color barriers in parking lot<br />
Incorrect mirror height </p>
<p>We have fallen through a Kafkaesque rabbit hole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
