Comments on: Schuette v. Coalition, in tweets https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/04/schuette-v-coalition-tweets/ Chronicling the high cost of our legal system Tue, 29 Apr 2014 12:00:58 +0000 hourly 1 By: College Admissions | Affirmative Action | Freedom https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/04/schuette-v-coalition-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-282132 Tue, 29 Apr 2014 12:00:58 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=45425#comment-282132 […] Olson summarized highlights of the Supreme Court’s ruling (including the Justices’ plurality, concurring, and […]

]]> By: A Victory for Taxpayers and Equal Protection: Supreme Court Upholds Michigan’s Proposal 2 https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/04/schuette-v-coalition-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-281952 Mon, 28 Apr 2014 13:11:54 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=45425#comment-281952 […] Olson summarized other highlights of the Supreme Court’s ruling (including the Justices’ plurality, […]

]]> By: Supreme Court on racial preferences, cont'd - Overlawyered https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/04/schuette-v-coalition-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-281085 Thu, 24 Apr 2014 04:45:03 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=45425#comment-281085 […] A few more notes on the case already covered yesterday in tweet form: […]

]]> By: Ron Miller https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/04/schuette-v-coalition-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-280998 Wed, 23 Apr 2014 16:31:08 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=45425#comment-280998 This whole thing is ridiculous and outrageous. You should be ashamed.

How can you justify this blatant end-run around the 140 character word limit on Twitter?

]]>