<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Supreme Court: recess appointments, protest buffer zones	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/06/supreme-court-recess-appointments-protest-buffer-zones/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/06/supreme-court-recess-appointments-protest-buffer-zones/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 04:30:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: July 3 roundup - Overlawyered		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/06/supreme-court-recess-appointments-protest-buffer-zones/comment-page-1/#comment-294482</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[July 3 roundup - Overlawyered]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 04:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=46762#comment-294482</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] buffer zone statute &#8220;should have been upheld, not struck down&#8221; [Hoover Institution, earlier on McCullen v. Coakley, my related [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] buffer zone statute &#8220;should have been upheld, not struck down&#8221; [Hoover Institution, earlier on McCullen v. Coakley, my related [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: No Name Guy		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/06/supreme-court-recess-appointments-protest-buffer-zones/comment-page-1/#comment-293335</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[No Name Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2014 15:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=46762#comment-293335</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Well,  Justices Kagan and Sotomayor have some sense shame left in them.  How else (e.g. being shameless) could someone with a straight face argue against the plain language of the Constitution (on the appointments) for example.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well,  Justices Kagan and Sotomayor have some sense shame left in them.  How else (e.g. being shameless) could someone with a straight face argue against the plain language of the Constitution (on the appointments) for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
