<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: &#8220;Large corporations are crushing smaller ones &#8230;&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/12/large-corporations-crushing-smaller-ones/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/12/large-corporations-crushing-smaller-ones/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2014 09:14:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: mx		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/12/large-corporations-crushing-smaller-ones/comment-page-1/#comment-315365</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mx]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2014 09:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=50146#comment-315365</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Believe me I&#039;m no fan of Mr. Edelman&#039;s emails. But it seems a far stretch to equate a single non-governmental consumer sending a couple of emails citing a law that basically says &quot;don&#039;t defraud people&quot; and the regulatory compliance burden placed on small businesses. This wasn&#039;t a governmental audit demanding months worth of records or a prop 65 shakedown of a small business. It was a customer upset because he was charged more than the restaurant&#039;s advertised price. 

Coyote&#039;s argument is counterproductive. If the regulatory burdens faced by small businesses really were akin to a single pissed off customer, then we&#039;d already be living in a libertarian utopia.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Believe me I&#8217;m no fan of Mr. Edelman&#8217;s emails. But it seems a far stretch to equate a single non-governmental consumer sending a couple of emails citing a law that basically says &#8220;don&#8217;t defraud people&#8221; and the regulatory compliance burden placed on small businesses. This wasn&#8217;t a governmental audit demanding months worth of records or a prop 65 shakedown of a small business. It was a customer upset because he was charged more than the restaurant&#8217;s advertised price. </p>
<p>Coyote&#8217;s argument is counterproductive. If the regulatory burdens faced by small businesses really were akin to a single pissed off customer, then we&#8217;d already be living in a libertarian utopia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
