<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Update: &#8220;I’ll pay them a million dollars if they can do it.”	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/12/million-dollar-promise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/12/million-dollar-promise/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2014 23:26:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: captnhal		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/12/million-dollar-promise/comment-page-1/#comment-315584</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[captnhal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2014 23:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=50178#comment-315584</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So lawyers can make claims in court when they thare are supposedly obligated to tell the truth and the penalty when proven false is nothing?  I don&#039;t buy the excuse that it was intended as a joke.  The intent was to seriously sway the jury.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So lawyers can make claims in court when they thare are supposedly obligated to tell the truth and the penalty when proven false is nothing?  I don&#8217;t buy the excuse that it was intended as a joke.  The intent was to seriously sway the jury.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Hugo S. Cunningham		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2014/12/million-dollar-promise/comment-page-1/#comment-315569</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hugo S. Cunningham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2014 19:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=50178#comment-315569</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Would the court have ruled in the claimant&#039;s favor if the defense counsel had affirmed his promise under cross-examination:
&quot;You say that you will pay one million dollars to anyone who can meet the prosecution&#039;s time-line.  Is that a binding commitment made under oath, or just empty rhetoric?&quot;

Attorneys are not subject to cross-examination, however, so I suppose my scenario is moot.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would the court have ruled in the claimant&#8217;s favor if the defense counsel had affirmed his promise under cross-examination:<br />
&#8220;You say that you will pay one million dollars to anyone who can meet the prosecution&#8217;s time-line.  Is that a binding commitment made under oath, or just empty rhetoric?&#8221;</p>
<p>Attorneys are not subject to cross-examination, however, so I suppose my scenario is moot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
