<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: &#8220;Liability Concerns Prompt Some Cities to Limit Sledding&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/01/liability-concerns-prompt-cities-limit-sledding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/01/liability-concerns-prompt-cities-limit-sledding/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2015 05:30:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: January 12 roundup - Overlawyered		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/01/liability-concerns-prompt-cities-limit-sledding/comment-page-1/#comment-317399</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[January 12 roundup - Overlawyered]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2015 05:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=50568#comment-317399</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] &#8220;Don&#8217;t the attorneys who bring these [sled injury municipal] lawsuits have kids and don&#8217;t any of them go sledding together?&#8221; [Abby Schachter, Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, quoting my response to that question; Nicole Kaeding, Cato; earlier] [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] &#8220;Don&#8217;t the attorneys who bring these [sled injury municipal] lawsuits have kids and don&#8217;t any of them go sledding together?&#8221; [Abby Schachter, Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, quoting my response to that question; Nicole Kaeding, Cato; earlier] [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jack		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/01/liability-concerns-prompt-cities-limit-sledding/comment-page-1/#comment-316670</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2015 15:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=50568#comment-316670</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It would be nice if the media coverage was more specific on why the liability still exists.  In Iowa, e.g., a bill was introduced in 2011 that would have immunized municipalities from liability for sledding accidents, but it was defeated in the house on party-line votes (R-for, D-against) because the trial lawyers association opposed it.  In 2013, the bill passed the house by a largely part-line vote (see &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.legis.iowa.gov/docs/pubs/hjweb/pdf/February%2013,%202013.pdf#page=9&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;H.F. 158&lt;/a&gt;) and withered in the senate (26 D, 24 R).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be nice if the media coverage was more specific on why the liability still exists.  In Iowa, e.g., a bill was introduced in 2011 that would have immunized municipalities from liability for sledding accidents, but it was defeated in the house on party-line votes (R-for, D-against) because the trial lawyers association opposed it.  In 2013, the bill passed the house by a largely part-line vote (see <a href="https://www.legis.iowa.gov/docs/pubs/hjweb/pdf/February%2013,%202013.pdf#page=9" rel="nofollow">H.F. 158</a>) and withered in the senate (26 D, 24 R).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
