<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: State of free speech doctrine at Harvard	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/01/state-free-speech-law-harvard-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/01/state-free-speech-law-harvard-law/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2015 22:00:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: OBQuiet		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/01/state-free-speech-law-harvard-law/comment-page-1/#comment-318534</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[OBQuiet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2015 22:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=50935#comment-318534</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Interesting idea. So when some atheist mocks religion, the believers have to attack in order to preserver they future rights? 

Or maybe we could hold that since some political views cause extremists to take action, we should not allow them to be mentioned. If far right extremists were to bomb a left-friendly newspaper over a less than flattering article they too offense to, should we say that printing progressive ideas should be banned?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting idea. So when some atheist mocks religion, the believers have to attack in order to preserver they future rights? </p>
<p>Or maybe we could hold that since some political views cause extremists to take action, we should not allow them to be mentioned. If far right extremists were to bomb a left-friendly newspaper over a less than flattering article they too offense to, should we say that printing progressive ideas should be banned?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jack		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/01/state-free-speech-law-harvard-law/comment-page-1/#comment-318456</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 14:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=50935#comment-318456</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s another good takedown of Wickham: http://www.thecollegefix.com/post/20943/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s another good takedown of Wickham: <a href="http://www.thecollegefix.com/post/20943/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.thecollegefix.com/post/20943/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
