<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The unfolding costs of FATCA	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/01/unfolding-costs-fatca/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/01/unfolding-costs-fatca/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2015 03:41:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Hugo S. Cunningham		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/01/unfolding-costs-fatca/comment-page-1/#comment-316347</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hugo S. Cunningham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2015 03:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=50462#comment-316347</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have read statements from FATCA defenders that the costs would start to even out if the EU, not necessarily tax-averse, accepted our implicit invitation to enact an interlocking FATCA of their own, creating a worldwide tax-collectors&#039; utopia.  So far, I gather they have not shown much interest.  Even if they wanted to start taxing expatriates on foreign income,  they probably are wary of double-crosses by protectionists and other special interests in the US Congress.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have read statements from FATCA defenders that the costs would start to even out if the EU, not necessarily tax-averse, accepted our implicit invitation to enact an interlocking FATCA of their own, creating a worldwide tax-collectors&#8217; utopia.  So far, I gather they have not shown much interest.  Even if they wanted to start taxing expatriates on foreign income,  they probably are wary of double-crosses by protectionists and other special interests in the US Congress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
