<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Labor and employment roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/02/labor-employment-roundup-39/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/02/labor-employment-roundup-39/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2015 15:57:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ilya S.		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/02/labor-employment-roundup-39/comment-page-1/#comment-319101</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ilya S.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2015 15:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=50782#comment-319101</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Labor &#038; Employment laws and policies are often a subject in which I engage in debate with people I know from the far left. I try my best to show them how the policies always result in nothing good for the people they intend to help. But there are two problems: 1) they just jump on whatever other circumstances led to the bad effects and the discussion goes nowhere; and 2) they inherently suspect anything logical or factual I say because they know my ideological leanings probably produce my own confirmation bias. Are there any tips to overcome these problems? All these people are activist- and policy-types and I really fear for the future if they enter into positions of power without questioning their assumptions.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Labor &amp; Employment laws and policies are often a subject in which I engage in debate with people I know from the far left. I try my best to show them how the policies always result in nothing good for the people they intend to help. But there are two problems: 1) they just jump on whatever other circumstances led to the bad effects and the discussion goes nowhere; and 2) they inherently suspect anything logical or factual I say because they know my ideological leanings probably produce my own confirmation bias. Are there any tips to overcome these problems? All these people are activist- and policy-types and I really fear for the future if they enter into positions of power without questioning their assumptions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
