<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Please Don&#8217;t Eat the Daffodils	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/02/please-dont-eat-daffodils/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/02/please-dont-eat-daffodils/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2015 05:48:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Monday smile &#8211; Please don&#8217;t eat the daffodils &#124; From Words to Deeds: translation &#38; the law		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/02/please-dont-eat-daffodils/comment-page-1/#comment-320156</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Monday smile &#8211; Please don&#8217;t eat the daffodils &#124; From Words to Deeds: translation &#38; the law]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2015 05:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=51299#comment-320156</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] I discovered the initiative on the blog Overlawyered, where the author points out that a public information campaign might be more effective than [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I discovered the initiative on the blog Overlawyered, where the author points out that a public information campaign might be more effective than [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Walter Olson		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/02/please-dont-eat-daffodils/comment-page-1/#comment-319442</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2015 00:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=51299#comment-319442</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[MX&#039;s notion here is that when business managers receive a safety-related letter from their regulators stating &quot;We are asking you... to ensure,&quot; they regard it as merely hortatory and a helpful suggestion, to ignore or act on as they please. I think that notion would surprise many managers in regulated lines of business.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MX&#8217;s notion here is that when business managers receive a safety-related letter from their regulators stating &#8220;We are asking you&#8230; to ensure,&#8221; they regard it as merely hortatory and a helpful suggestion, to ignore or act on as they please. I think that notion would surprise many managers in regulated lines of business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: D		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/02/please-dont-eat-daffodils/comment-page-1/#comment-319440</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[D]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2015 23:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=51299#comment-319440</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As I recall, the Bucky Balls fiasco started with a polite request that was politely declined.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I recall, the Bucky Balls fiasco started with a polite request that was politely declined.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: mx		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/02/please-dont-eat-daffodils/comment-page-1/#comment-319408</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mx]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2015 08:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=51299#comment-319408</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Not sure why it&#039;s Gail Heriot week all of a sudden here, but in any case...

Nobody is pushing a regulation here. This is simply a polite request to consider whether keeping toxic plants next to edible plants is a wonderful idea. That doesn&#039;t preclude an informational campaign in relevant communities as well. 

Grocery stores should obviously be prepared to handle spills anywhere within the market; one can just as easily shatter a glass jar in aisle #4 as they can spill water in the flower section. It&#039;s absurd to think that a voluntary suggestion to try to reduce the number of unfortunately confused people who wind up sick will somehow cause an epidemic of fallen little old ladies. Furthermore, no market I&#039;ve ever seen has a dedicated &quot;guy with a mop&quot; on standby in the produce aisle; that&#039;s why we have the expression &quot;cleanup on aisle #3.&quot;

I suppose the obvious solution is yet more customer choice. Allow markets to put their daffodils wherever they wish, but require them to post their spill cleanup plans on the front door. That way customers can decide whether they want to take the risk of entering the store based on how quickly spills will be attended to. And while they are at it, they can review the other 1,500 pages of customer choice disclosure information available on the front door. A door which has collapsed onto the customer under the weight of all the paper. Don&#039;t worry, customer choice disclosure advocates are working on a scheme by which businesses can post their door safety plans.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure why it&#8217;s Gail Heriot week all of a sudden here, but in any case&#8230;</p>
<p>Nobody is pushing a regulation here. This is simply a polite request to consider whether keeping toxic plants next to edible plants is a wonderful idea. That doesn&#8217;t preclude an informational campaign in relevant communities as well. </p>
<p>Grocery stores should obviously be prepared to handle spills anywhere within the market; one can just as easily shatter a glass jar in aisle #4 as they can spill water in the flower section. It&#8217;s absurd to think that a voluntary suggestion to try to reduce the number of unfortunately confused people who wind up sick will somehow cause an epidemic of fallen little old ladies. Furthermore, no market I&#8217;ve ever seen has a dedicated &#8220;guy with a mop&#8221; on standby in the produce aisle; that&#8217;s why we have the expression &#8220;cleanup on aisle #3.&#8221;</p>
<p>I suppose the obvious solution is yet more customer choice. Allow markets to put their daffodils wherever they wish, but require them to post their spill cleanup plans on the front door. That way customers can decide whether they want to take the risk of entering the store based on how quickly spills will be attended to. And while they are at it, they can review the other 1,500 pages of customer choice disclosure information available on the front door. A door which has collapsed onto the customer under the weight of all the paper. Don&#8217;t worry, customer choice disclosure advocates are working on a scheme by which businesses can post their door safety plans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
