<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Sheldon Silver and lawyers in politics	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/02/sheldon-silver-lawyers-politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/02/sheldon-silver-lawyers-politics/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2015 01:30:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: bean spout		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/02/sheldon-silver-lawyers-politics/comment-page-1/#comment-319104</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bean spout]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2015 17:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=51119#comment-319104</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There is nothing unethical about a law firm paying a high profile personage to appear on its roster, to do little or nothing but add advertising glam, if the law firm thinks that will attract paying clients. Nonprofits play this game incessantly in their &quot;Boards of Directors.&quot; I have no love for Silver, but the closer you look at these charges the more they appear potentially bogus. Symbolic prosecution, once again, that will not fix the real underlying problems of corrupt and/or incompetent political actors making boatloads of bad law. It may however make a name for Preet Bharara as a crusader.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is nothing unethical about a law firm paying a high profile personage to appear on its roster, to do little or nothing but add advertising glam, if the law firm thinks that will attract paying clients. Nonprofits play this game incessantly in their &#8220;Boards of Directors.&#8221; I have no love for Silver, but the closer you look at these charges the more they appear potentially bogus. Symbolic prosecution, once again, that will not fix the real underlying problems of corrupt and/or incompetent political actors making boatloads of bad law. It may however make a name for Preet Bharara as a crusader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: DensityDuck		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/02/sheldon-silver-lawyers-politics/comment-page-1/#comment-318989</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DensityDuck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2015 15:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=51119#comment-318989</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Big money going to Senate members from business interests?  I&#039;m sure that we&#039;ll hear all about &quot;dark money&quot; from the usual players.

Oh, who am I kidding?  It doesn&#039;t involve the Koch brothers so nobody cares.  Besides, they were donating to Democrats so it was probably a good cause, right?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big money going to Senate members from business interests?  I&#8217;m sure that we&#8217;ll hear all about &#8220;dark money&#8221; from the usual players.</p>
<p>Oh, who am I kidding?  It doesn&#8217;t involve the Koch brothers so nobody cares.  Besides, they were donating to Democrats so it was probably a good cause, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
