<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: More on that wacky New Mexico environmental ordinance	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/02/wacky-new-mexico-environmental-ordinance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/02/wacky-new-mexico-environmental-ordinance/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 16:59:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Weekly Standard criticizes Mora County's ordinance banning oil and gas drilling &#124; New Mexico Appellate Law Blog		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/02/wacky-new-mexico-environmental-ordinance/comment-page-1/#comment-319814</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Weekly Standard criticizes Mora County's ordinance banning oil and gas drilling &#124; New Mexico Appellate Law Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 16:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=51429#comment-319814</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] In the Weekly Standard, Joseph Bottum has written a story called &#8220;Fracking the Constitution: Secessionism on the Left,&#8221; which criticizes the Mora County ordinance banning oil and gas drilling. (Hat tip to Overlawyered). [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] In the Weekly Standard, Joseph Bottum has written a story called &#8220;Fracking the Constitution: Secessionism on the Left,&#8221; which criticizes the Mora County ordinance banning oil and gas drilling. (Hat tip to Overlawyered). [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/02/wacky-new-mexico-environmental-ordinance/comment-page-1/#comment-319812</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 15:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=51429#comment-319812</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Jeb Stuart? Really? With that exception, the weekly standard article is actually pretty good.

One of the out – on – a – limb  things that they did in the New Mexico ordinance was to  claim that the groundwater was held in public trust by the county (note that this appears to be in addition to any powers they may have as alocal board of health, something I assume the county does have). That theory has been advanced in some places in New York, at least where a Township holds title to local waters because of some colonial era patent issued to the town trustees. Not sure that it would fly if tested in litigation, though, even  in New York , because the context of those patents makes it pretty clear that the contemplated &quot;waters&quot; are surface waters e.g. lakes, bays, and the lands beneath them.
Does New Mexico local government have some powers derived from a Spanish royal charter?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeb Stuart? Really? With that exception, the weekly standard article is actually pretty good.</p>
<p>One of the out – on – a – limb  things that they did in the New Mexico ordinance was to  claim that the groundwater was held in public trust by the county (note that this appears to be in addition to any powers they may have as alocal board of health, something I assume the county does have). That theory has been advanced in some places in New York, at least where a Township holds title to local waters because of some colonial era patent issued to the town trustees. Not sure that it would fly if tested in litigation, though, even  in New York , because the context of those patents makes it pretty clear that the contemplated &#8220;waters&#8221; are surface waters e.g. lakes, bays, and the lands beneath them.<br />
Does New Mexico local government have some powers derived from a Spanish royal charter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
