<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Warrantless police access to hotel records	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/02/warrantless-police-access-hotel-records/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/02/warrantless-police-access-hotel-records/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2015 04:30:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Supreme Court roundup - Overlawyered		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/02/warrantless-police-access-hotel-records/comment-page-1/#comment-320416</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Supreme Court roundup - Overlawyered]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2015 04:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=51604#comment-320416</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] warrantless access to hotel guest registries [James Copland on Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz brief; earlier Cato [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] warrantless access to hotel guest registries [James Copland on Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz brief; earlier Cato [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Allan		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/02/warrantless-police-access-hotel-records/comment-page-1/#comment-319779</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Allan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 00:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=51604#comment-319779</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I write to point out that this is not a case of an individual traveller (or travellers as a group) complaining of a violation of the fourth amendment.  As odious as it seems, there does not seem to be any prohibition on the hoteliers voluntarilly giving up their records.  Thus, it seems that, once you give a business your information, you have forfeited your rights to the information under the fourth amendment.

I agree with the CATO view. The government should not be able to search those records without permission from the record holder or a warrant.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I write to point out that this is not a case of an individual traveller (or travellers as a group) complaining of a violation of the fourth amendment.  As odious as it seems, there does not seem to be any prohibition on the hoteliers voluntarilly giving up their records.  Thus, it seems that, once you give a business your information, you have forfeited your rights to the information under the fourth amendment.</p>
<p>I agree with the CATO view. The government should not be able to search those records without permission from the record holder or a warrant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
