<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: &#8220;Report Urges Britain To Take Small-Claims Cases Online&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/03/report-urges-britain-to-take-small-claims-cases-online/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/03/report-urges-britain-to-take-small-claims-cases-online/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2015 17:52:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: E-Bell		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/03/report-urges-britain-to-take-small-claims-cases-online/comment-page-1/#comment-320168</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[E-Bell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2015 17:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=51835#comment-320168</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[An interesting idea that has a certain attraction for the efficiency it offers, but I hope they don&#039;t use eBay as a model for anything because its process often results in an unjust benefit to a dishonest buyer to the detriment of a good faith seller.

Leaving that aside, there are of course due process and transparency concerns of an online system.  But if a would-be litigant is willing to give up some rights in order to gain an efficient resolution, who am I to judge?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting idea that has a certain attraction for the efficiency it offers, but I hope they don&#8217;t use eBay as a model for anything because its process often results in an unjust benefit to a dishonest buyer to the detriment of a good faith seller.</p>
<p>Leaving that aside, there are of course due process and transparency concerns of an online system.  But if a would-be litigant is willing to give up some rights in order to gain an efficient resolution, who am I to judge?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
