<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Update: Sixth Circuit green-lights &#8220;Raging Bitch&#8221; ale	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/03/update-sixth-circuit-green-lights-raging-bitch-ale/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/03/update-sixth-circuit-green-lights-raging-bitch-ale/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2016 15:23:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Boblipton		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/03/update-sixth-circuit-green-lights-raging-bitch-ale/comment-page-1/#comment-320351</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boblipton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2015 21:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=51950#comment-320351</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Although the CEO claims that bureaucrats will now be responsible for their violations of constitutional rights (including the right to print &quot;shit&quot; on a beer label), I fail to see how this is an affirmation of a bureaucrat&#039;s responsibility, unless one or more is fired for this. I assume that&#039;s why the label was shut down.

This is another issue which is a matter about pure rights.  It certainly isn&#039;t about the quality of the beer, which, even if I had the opportunity to try it, I would not take it;  even though the word &quot;shit&quot;  is preceded by &quot;no&quot;.

Anyway isn&#039;t that false to fact?  Isn&#039;t alcohol yeast shit?

Bob]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although the CEO claims that bureaucrats will now be responsible for their violations of constitutional rights (including the right to print &#8220;shit&#8221; on a beer label), I fail to see how this is an affirmation of a bureaucrat&#8217;s responsibility, unless one or more is fired for this. I assume that&#8217;s why the label was shut down.</p>
<p>This is another issue which is a matter about pure rights.  It certainly isn&#8217;t about the quality of the beer, which, even if I had the opportunity to try it, I would not take it;  even though the word &#8220;shit&#8221;  is preceded by &#8220;no&#8221;.</p>
<p>Anyway isn&#8217;t that false to fact?  Isn&#8217;t alcohol yeast shit?</p>
<p>Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
