<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: A Wisconsin John Doe question	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/04/a-wisconsin-john-doe-question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/04/a-wisconsin-john-doe-question/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2015 02:22:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: MattS		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/04/a-wisconsin-john-doe-question/comment-page-1/#comment-322509</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MattS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2015 02:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=52786#comment-322509</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/04/a-wisconsin-john-doe-question/comment-page-1/#comment-322500&quot;&gt;Hugo S Cunningham&lt;/a&gt;.

There is one possible angle for Congress to get involved legally.  According to the Article, FBI agents were involved in these John Doe raids, raids conducted entirely under state law.  Congress should start asking why the FBI was involved in these raids.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/04/a-wisconsin-john-doe-question/comment-page-1/#comment-322500">Hugo S Cunningham</a>.</p>
<p>There is one possible angle for Congress to get involved legally.  According to the Article, FBI agents were involved in these John Doe raids, raids conducted entirely under state law.  Congress should start asking why the FBI was involved in these raids.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Hugo S Cunningham		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/04/a-wisconsin-john-doe-question/comment-page-1/#comment-322500</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hugo S Cunningham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2015 19:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=52786#comment-322500</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[IANAL, but doesn&#039;t a Congressional subpoena outrank a State gag order?  Congress could provide legal cover for the victims to disclose everything.

Congress has no authority to impeach State officials; nevertheless,a Congressional resolution that the &quot;John Doe&quot; prosecutors and enablers are &quot;unfit for any office of trust or profit under the United States&quot; would promise a nasty fight to any Democratic President inclined to nominate one of these KGB-wannabes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IANAL, but doesn&#8217;t a Congressional subpoena outrank a State gag order?  Congress could provide legal cover for the victims to disclose everything.</p>
<p>Congress has no authority to impeach State officials; nevertheless,a Congressional resolution that the &#8220;John Doe&#8221; prosecutors and enablers are &#8220;unfit for any office of trust or profit under the United States&#8221; would promise a nasty fight to any Democratic President inclined to nominate one of these KGB-wannabes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
