Comments on: Garry Trudeau vs. Charlie Hebdo

By: Freedom of thought and the public domain | Media Meditations

Freedom of thought and the public domain | Media Meditations — Thu, 23 Apr 2015 22:57:14 +0000

[…] Garry Trudeau vs. Charlie Hebdo […]

By: Doonesbury and disrespect, cont'd - Overlawyered

Doonesbury and disrespect, cont'd - Overlawyered — Sat, 18 Apr 2015 17:45:57 +0000

[…] Reminder: as you lie bleeding to death on your office floor for drawing satire, Garry Trudeau will sneer at you for “punching down.” Greg Lukianoff and Patheos’s “Terry Firma” weigh in on the “Doonesbury” cartoonist’s sad contribution to the Charlie Hebdo discussion. Earlier here. […]

By: Hugo S Cunningham

Hugo S Cunningham — Mon, 13 Apr 2015 17:37:47 +0000

I had vaguely fond memories of Trudeau’s Doonesbury strip from my college days in the early 1970s, but had lost track of him in recent decades. Then I heard last fall that he had “jumped the shark” with a series of strips taking Rolling Stone’s UVA article at face value even after it had been discredited. Now I find that he is a truly despicable human being who would deny others the same protections he had enjoyed himself. Last year those protective of his reputation should have chloroformed and stuffed him.

By: Bill Poser

Bill Poser — Mon, 13 Apr 2015 15:46:04 +0000

There is one point that hasn’t as far as I know really been addressed, namely the claim that, although at the world level, Muslims are numerous and powerful, within France they are an oppressed minority, as a result of which it is inappropriate for a French publication to criticize or insult t hem. While many French Muslims are indeed alienated, and while there is indeed anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim sentiment, French Muslims are by most standards quite well off. The great majority of them have French nationality and are not at risk of deportation. They are not confined to refugee camps or detention centers.The welfare system means that they are neither starving nor homeless. They have access to health care and to free public education. They are not at risk of violence either from the state or from individuals. They are free to practice their religion and to speak and write what they like. To a large extent, their alienation is the result of their own decisions not to integrate and their rejection of the secularism of the French state.