<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: New York investigates retailers over unpredictable schedules	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/05/new-york-investigates-retailers-over-unpredictable-schedules/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/05/new-york-investigates-retailers-over-unpredictable-schedules/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2015 15:19:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: John Nichols		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/05/new-york-investigates-retailers-over-unpredictable-schedules/comment-page-1/#comment-323179</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Nichols]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2015 17:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=52467#comment-323179</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m confused by this post. The NPR article doesn&#039;t say anything about Starbucks or Costco. The other website makes some kind of innuendo which even it admits is unfounded: &quot;Maybe there is some good reason for this.&quot;

Yeah, maybe there is some good reason for this, like maybe those employers weren&#039;t suspected or reported to have engaged in the illegal behavior? There are 100,000+ employers in New York and 13 received letters, so why this innuendo about 3 of the 99,987+ employers who didn&#039;t receive letters?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m confused by this post. The NPR article doesn&#8217;t say anything about Starbucks or Costco. The other website makes some kind of innuendo which even it admits is unfounded: &#8220;Maybe there is some good reason for this.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, maybe there is some good reason for this, like maybe those employers weren&#8217;t suspected or reported to have engaged in the illegal behavior? There are 100,000+ employers in New York and 13 received letters, so why this innuendo about 3 of the 99,987+ employers who didn&#8217;t receive letters?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Allan		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/05/new-york-investigates-retailers-over-unpredictable-schedules/comment-page-1/#comment-323145</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Allan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2015 19:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=52467#comment-323145</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[outside of the soundness of the law policy...  I am shocked that there might be even a scent of corruption in New York.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>outside of the soundness of the law policy&#8230;  I am shocked that there might be even a scent of corruption in New York.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Erik H.		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/05/new-york-investigates-retailers-over-unpredictable-schedules/comment-page-1/#comment-323141</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Erik H.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2015 17:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=52467#comment-323141</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Excluding based on political issues would be unethical.  But the law itself is probably sensible.

Locking in time won&#039;t cost the employer all that much--honestly, most folks have a very good idea how much staffing they need, and it isn&#039;t all that much harder to assign shifts 2-3 days in advance than it is to do it 12 hours in advance.  

But that small cost to employers is easily balanced by the benefits. It vastly increases the ability of workers to be OTHERWISE economically productive, which usually requires at least some advance planning.  You&#039;re going to give an employee 20 hours a week anyway--why not do it in a manner which allows them to work a few side gigs and double their marginal income? Why not do it in a way that allows them to schedule for caretaking, and thus to reduce their sick days?  Etc.

It&#039;s a payback far in excess of, say, raising the minimum wage.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excluding based on political issues would be unethical.  But the law itself is probably sensible.</p>
<p>Locking in time won&#8217;t cost the employer all that much&#8211;honestly, most folks have a very good idea how much staffing they need, and it isn&#8217;t all that much harder to assign shifts 2-3 days in advance than it is to do it 12 hours in advance.  </p>
<p>But that small cost to employers is easily balanced by the benefits. It vastly increases the ability of workers to be OTHERWISE economically productive, which usually requires at least some advance planning.  You&#8217;re going to give an employee 20 hours a week anyway&#8211;why not do it in a manner which allows them to work a few side gigs and double their marginal income? Why not do it in a way that allows them to schedule for caretaking, and thus to reduce their sick days?  Etc.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a payback far in excess of, say, raising the minimum wage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John Fembup		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/05/new-york-investigates-retailers-over-unpredictable-schedules/comment-page-1/#comment-323136</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Fembup]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2015 15:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=52467#comment-323136</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What next?  Investigate shoppers for unpredictable buying behaviors?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What next?  Investigate shoppers for unpredictable buying behaviors?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
