<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Trans fats banned! Now make way for palm and coconut oil, GMOs&#8230;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/06/fda-trans-fat-palm-gmo-soybean-oil/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/06/fda-trans-fat-palm-gmo-soybean-oil/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2015 21:24:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: William Nuesslein		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/06/fda-trans-fat-palm-gmo-soybean-oil/comment-page-1/#comment-324901</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[William Nuesslein]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2015 21:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=53774#comment-324901</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There was a guy on CNN, Jake Tapper the lead, saying that there all kinds of deaths from the sprinkles on donuts. GOOD GRIEF. 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a guy on CNN, Jake Tapper the lead, saying that there all kinds of deaths from the sprinkles on donuts. GOOD GRIEF. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Amy Alkon		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/06/fda-trans-fat-palm-gmo-soybean-oil/comment-page-1/#comment-324885</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amy Alkon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2015 15:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=53774#comment-324885</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ridiculous move by government. I&#039;ve eaten very low carb since March of 2009 -- against the bad and unscientific advice by government (to eat a high-carb, lowfat -- and unhealthy!) diet. Eating against the government&#039;s unscientific, bad advice, I have the health stats of an elite athlete -- while spending much of the day in a chair, weeping over a keyboard (uh, writing). If I decide to have a cookie with trans fat in it at a party, it&#039;s none of the government&#039;s damn business. Or should be none of the government&#039;s damn business.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ridiculous move by government. I&#8217;ve eaten very low carb since March of 2009 &#8212; against the bad and unscientific advice by government (to eat a high-carb, lowfat &#8212; and unhealthy!) diet. Eating against the government&#8217;s unscientific, bad advice, I have the health stats of an elite athlete &#8212; while spending much of the day in a chair, weeping over a keyboard (uh, writing). If I decide to have a cookie with trans fat in it at a party, it&#8217;s none of the government&#8217;s damn business. Or should be none of the government&#8217;s damn business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: DEM		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/06/fda-trans-fat-palm-gmo-soybean-oil/comment-page-1/#comment-324884</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DEM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2015 14:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=53774#comment-324884</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What is the FDA&#039;s authority for banning a food that is safe in moderate quantities?  Is this another example of Chevron deference run amok?  And if so, just how far does administrative law-making have to go before SCOTUS says, enough!, and re-visits Chevron.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the FDA&#8217;s authority for banning a food that is safe in moderate quantities?  Is this another example of Chevron deference run amok?  And if so, just how far does administrative law-making have to go before SCOTUS says, enough!, and re-visits Chevron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
