<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: L.A. v. Patel: law must allow hotels to contest police access to registries	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/06/l-a-v-patel-law-must-allow-hotels-to-contest-police-access-to-registries/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/06/l-a-v-patel-law-must-allow-hotels-to-contest-police-access-to-registries/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2016 15:23:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Marty		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/06/l-a-v-patel-law-must-allow-hotels-to-contest-police-access-to-registries/comment-page-1/#comment-325178</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2015 14:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=53857#comment-325178</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[One would hope there is some sort of exception for visiting foreigners. (Likely a primary reason for the historical scrutiny?)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One would hope there is some sort of exception for visiting foreigners. (Likely a primary reason for the historical scrutiny?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Walter Olson		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/06/l-a-v-patel-law-must-allow-hotels-to-contest-police-access-to-registries/comment-page-1/#comment-325149</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2015 14:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=53857#comment-325149</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Mark, that&#039;s a surprising thing to say about Justice Scalia given his role in numerous cases as a premier defender of the Fourth Amendment, often joining with more liberal justices to strike down overreaching searches and seizures:

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/antonin-scalia-fighter-privacy-rights-fourth-amendment

His ruling in the hotel case was a break from that familiar pattern, and, by its own terms, was grounded in precedents in which innkeepers had historically been subject to an unusual degree of state scrutiny.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, that&#8217;s a surprising thing to say about Justice Scalia given his role in numerous cases as a premier defender of the Fourth Amendment, often joining with more liberal justices to strike down overreaching searches and seizures:</p>
<p><a href="http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/antonin-scalia-fighter-privacy-rights-fourth-amendment" rel="nofollow ugc">http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/antonin-scalia-fighter-privacy-rights-fourth-amendment</a></p>
<p>His ruling in the hotel case was a break from that familiar pattern, and, by its own terms, was grounded in precedents in which innkeepers had historically been subject to an unusual degree of state scrutiny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/06/l-a-v-patel-law-must-allow-hotels-to-contest-police-access-to-registries/comment-page-1/#comment-325134</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2015 02:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=53857#comment-325134</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Justice Scalia believes that the fourth amendment is not part of the Constitution that originalist defend.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justice Scalia believes that the fourth amendment is not part of the Constitution that originalist defend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
