<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Contingency fees + IRS = sound policy?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/07/contingency-fees-irs-sound-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/07/contingency-fees-irs-sound-policy/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2015 20:24:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/07/contingency-fees-irs-sound-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-326258</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2015 20:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=54453#comment-326258</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Re Mr. Olson: &quot;Will we ever learn our lesson on law enforcement for profit?&quot;

I don&#039;t think the aim of this project is &quot;law enforcement&quot; at all.

It is patronage. I was amazed, when I started my career in government, how much time politicians spend trying to put taxpayer money into the hands of their supporters.

The &quot;lesson&quot;  is not learnable.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re Mr. Olson: &#8220;Will we ever learn our lesson on law enforcement for profit?&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think the aim of this project is &#8220;law enforcement&#8221; at all.</p>
<p>It is patronage. I was amazed, when I started my career in government, how much time politicians spend trying to put taxpayer money into the hands of their supporters.</p>
<p>The &#8220;lesson&#8221;  is not learnable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John Fembup		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/07/contingency-fees-irs-sound-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-326186</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Fembup]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2015 15:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=54453#comment-326186</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Isn&#039;t it ironic that such tax collectors were called &quot;publicans&quot; at one time?  

Or perhaps this administration is bent on re-introducing scutage?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it ironic that such tax collectors were called &#8220;publicans&#8221; at one time?  </p>
<p>Or perhaps this administration is bent on re-introducing scutage?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: MattS		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/07/contingency-fees-irs-sound-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-326181</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MattS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2015 13:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=54453#comment-326181</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[No.

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge%27s_law_of_headlines]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No.</p>
<p>See <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge%27s_law_of_headlines" rel="nofollow ugc">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge%27s_law_of_headlines</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Canvasback		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/07/contingency-fees-irs-sound-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-326175</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Canvasback]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2015 11:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=54453#comment-326175</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Real Congressional action on this issue would mean unraveling the tax code. But that would be difficult. It seems easier to hire mercenaries to put a  hard shell around protected interests.
I see Sen. Grassley (R. Iowa) supports the idea. I couldn&#039;t find who actually inserted the rider in the bill.  In politics dumb ideas never go out of style.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Real Congressional action on this issue would mean unraveling the tax code. But that would be difficult. It seems easier to hire mercenaries to put a  hard shell around protected interests.<br />
I see Sen. Grassley (R. Iowa) supports the idea. I couldn&#8217;t find who actually inserted the rider in the bill.  In politics dumb ideas never go out of style.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
