<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: July 8 roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/07/july-8-roundup-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/07/july-8-roundup-5/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2015 11:11:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: John Fembup		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/07/july-8-roundup-5/comment-page-1/#comment-325629</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Fembup]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2015 11:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=53878#comment-325629</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;ACLU says its support for RFRA religious accommodation laws no longer applies in discrimination law context&quot;

Yeah.  

Which exemplifies how so-called progressives seek to immunize themselves from Saul Alinsky&#039;s rules i.e., RULE 4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.”

Because progressives will simply assert that their own book of rules does not apply.  At least not to them. At least not in this particular situation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;ACLU says its support for RFRA religious accommodation laws no longer applies in discrimination law context&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah.  </p>
<p>Which exemplifies how so-called progressives seek to immunize themselves from Saul Alinsky&#8217;s rules i.e., RULE 4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.”</p>
<p>Because progressives will simply assert that their own book of rules does not apply.  At least not to them. At least not in this particular situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
