<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Legal uncertainty is a bummer	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/07/legal-uncertainty-is-a-bummer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/07/legal-uncertainty-is-a-bummer/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2015 01:49:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris Hoey		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/07/legal-uncertainty-is-a-bummer/comment-page-1/#comment-325767</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Hoey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2015 01:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=54166#comment-325767</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So some congressional members are concerned about banks doing business with companies that deal in an illegal drug under Federal law, but let this administration run rough shod over stores selling legal guns and ammo to persons protected by the Second Amendment? Does anyone else see a problem with the reasoning behind this?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So some congressional members are concerned about banks doing business with companies that deal in an illegal drug under Federal law, but let this administration run rough shod over stores selling legal guns and ammo to persons protected by the Second Amendment? Does anyone else see a problem with the reasoning behind this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
