Comments on: NYC to carwashes: unionize or else

By: Mannie

Mannie — Sat, 04 Jul 2015 12:25:11 +0000

I don’t believe that is a cash bond but a surety bond. You buy those through your insurance agent. The The difference in cost should be about a hundred bucks.

It’s still evil, but it’s not as big a club as the headline indicates.

The Union Goons own NYC. Some of my associates had the chance to do disaster control work there after Hurricane Andy. They were basically run out of town. I didn’t bother to respond. Let them rot in the dark. They’s only Democrats. It’s not like people were suffering.

By: Hugo S Cunningham

Hugo S Cunningham — Sat, 04 Jul 2015 06:52:37 +0000

IANAL, but doesn’t such favoritism by States and their localities raise 14th Amendment “equal protection of the law” issues? Congress, by established case law, can require everyone to join a union, but did they delegate that power to States as well?

By: OBQuiet

OBQuiet — Fri, 03 Jul 2015 21:12:04 +0000

This make so much sense, I don’t see the issue here.

Clearly, any business that does not hire purely union workers puts its employees and customer at risk of violence from Union thugs(See Philly Ironworkers). So they must be ready to cover the liability that such a foolish action will produce.

It is the only responsible thing to do.