<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: August 5 roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/08/august-5-roundup-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/08/august-5-roundup-2/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2015 15:57:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: En Passant		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/08/august-5-roundup-2/comment-page-1/#comment-326431</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[En Passant]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2015 15:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=54323#comment-326431</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/08/august-5-roundup-2/comment-page-1/#comment-326332&quot;&gt;Bill Stade&lt;/a&gt;.

I don&#039;t think Walter has misrepresented anything.

The article states clearly:&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;em&gt;... Among the measures approved Tuesday by the County Council, one aims to improve taxi service and requires the County’s Department of Transportation to develop a plan to increase the number of wheelchair-accessible cabs that have lifts or ramps, with a goal of having &lt;strong&gt;100 percent accessible taxicabs within 10 years.&lt;/strong&gt; ...

... The law required that 6 percent of a taxicab company’s fleet comprise wheelchair-accessible cabs by the end of last year. Some companies exceeded the requirement, the taxicab commission said, but 20 companies did not comply and were recently ordered to cease operations.
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;Requiring 100% of every fleet to be wheelchair accessible makes no sense whatever. Taxis are dispatched. Anybody who calls a cab company can request an accessible cab. Cabs aren&#039;t buses that run fixed routes to pick up whatever passengers appear at a stop.

And even buses can only accommodate only a limited number of wheelchairs (usually 2 in my bus riding experience).

If a cab company is not refusing to dispatch an accessible cab to customers who request one, why should 100% of its fleet be accessible?

What&#039;s next? Requiring every restaurant menu item to be fat-free or sugar-free to accommodate the small percentage of customers who might have dietary limitations?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/08/august-5-roundup-2/comment-page-1/#comment-326332">Bill Stade</a>.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think Walter has misrepresented anything.</p>
<p>The article states clearly:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8230; Among the measures approved Tuesday by the County Council, one aims to improve taxi service and requires the County’s Department of Transportation to develop a plan to increase the number of wheelchair-accessible cabs that have lifts or ramps, with a goal of having <strong>100 percent accessible taxicabs within 10 years.</strong> &#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230; The law required that 6 percent of a taxicab company’s fleet comprise wheelchair-accessible cabs by the end of last year. Some companies exceeded the requirement, the taxicab commission said, but 20 companies did not comply and were recently ordered to cease operations.<br />
</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Requiring 100% of every fleet to be wheelchair accessible makes no sense whatever. Taxis are dispatched. Anybody who calls a cab company can request an accessible cab. Cabs aren&#8217;t buses that run fixed routes to pick up whatever passengers appear at a stop.</p>
<p>And even buses can only accommodate only a limited number of wheelchairs (usually 2 in my bus riding experience).</p>
<p>If a cab company is not refusing to dispatch an accessible cab to customers who request one, why should 100% of its fleet be accessible?</p>
<p>What&#8217;s next? Requiring every restaurant menu item to be fat-free or sugar-free to accommodate the small percentage of customers who might have dietary limitations?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bill Stade		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/08/august-5-roundup-2/comment-page-1/#comment-326332</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill Stade]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2015 03:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=54323#comment-326332</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Makes perfect sense: to make transportation more accessible to its residents, Montgomery County, Maryland orders 20 taxi companies to close down&quot; Well, I agree that requiring 100% is a mis-allocation of public assets, and putting companies out of business for noncompliance is ham fisted.  But, Walter, you are misrepresenting this article here and you are a better man than that. Cut it out.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Makes perfect sense: to make transportation more accessible to its residents, Montgomery County, Maryland orders 20 taxi companies to close down&#8221; Well, I agree that requiring 100% is a mis-allocation of public assets, and putting companies out of business for noncompliance is ham fisted.  But, Walter, you are misrepresenting this article here and you are a better man than that. Cut it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Robert		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/08/august-5-roundup-2/comment-page-1/#comment-326331</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2015 23:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=54323#comment-326331</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Re: the TPCA

Nearly all of the unsolicited robo calls I get are of the &quot;complete scam&quot; variety: Penny Stocks, &quot;Congratulations, You&#039;ve Won a Vacation&quot;, &quot;Your Business has been approved of a $250,000 loan&quot;, or &quot;We&#039;re calling from Google about your business listing&quot;.

No law will stop these people. They don&#039;t care about laws.

Instead there will just be more compliance costs and nuisance lawsuits for legit companies that call customers on stale numbers, etc.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: the TPCA</p>
<p>Nearly all of the unsolicited robo calls I get are of the &#8220;complete scam&#8221; variety: Penny Stocks, &#8220;Congratulations, You&#8217;ve Won a Vacation&#8221;, &#8220;Your Business has been approved of a $250,000 loan&#8221;, or &#8220;We&#8217;re calling from Google about your business listing&#8221;.</p>
<p>No law will stop these people. They don&#8217;t care about laws.</p>
<p>Instead there will just be more compliance costs and nuisance lawsuits for legit companies that call customers on stale numbers, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
