<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: California&#8217;s Unruh Act &#8220;provokes outrage&#8221;; it&#8217;s &#8220;invoked by the wrong people&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/09/californias-unruh-act-provokes-outrage-its-invoked-by-the-wrong-people/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/09/californias-unruh-act-provokes-outrage-its-invoked-by-the-wrong-people/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2015 00:26:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Robert		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/09/californias-unruh-act-provokes-outrage-its-invoked-by-the-wrong-people/comment-page-1/#comment-327400</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2015 00:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=55147#comment-327400</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m glad they&#039;re going after a &quot;Women in Tech&quot; group. These &quot;women&quot; have no interest in tech. They&#039;re all about income-redistribution, and lowering standards.

As an Asian (well, &quot;mid-eastern&quot;) silicon valley person, I can tell you first-hand that Silicon Valley has no &quot;diversity&quot; problem. The percentage of &quot;white&quot; people in tech companies, on average, is about 10% lower than the general population.

Women In Tech don&#039;t want women in tech. They already disrupted conferences like PyCon (see Adria Richards) and have bamboozled companies and conferences into adopting vague &quot;Codes of Conduct&quot; to prevent women from being stare-raped, or undergo the trauma of overhearing a joke that might have something to do with anatomy if you think about it too much. (Trigger Alert!)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad they&#8217;re going after a &#8220;Women in Tech&#8221; group. These &#8220;women&#8221; have no interest in tech. They&#8217;re all about income-redistribution, and lowering standards.</p>
<p>As an Asian (well, &#8220;mid-eastern&#8221;) silicon valley person, I can tell you first-hand that Silicon Valley has no &#8220;diversity&#8221; problem. The percentage of &#8220;white&#8221; people in tech companies, on average, is about 10% lower than the general population.</p>
<p>Women In Tech don&#8217;t want women in tech. They already disrupted conferences like PyCon (see Adria Richards) and have bamboozled companies and conferences into adopting vague &#8220;Codes of Conduct&#8221; to prevent women from being stare-raped, or undergo the trauma of overhearing a joke that might have something to do with anatomy if you think about it too much. (Trigger Alert!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: CarLitGuy		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/09/californias-unruh-act-provokes-outrage-its-invoked-by-the-wrong-people/comment-page-1/#comment-327395</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CarLitGuy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2015 15:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=55147#comment-327395</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/09/californias-unruh-act-provokes-outrage-its-invoked-by-the-wrong-people/comment-page-1/#comment-327388&quot;&gt;Scott Jacobs&lt;/a&gt;.

Mr. Jacobs&#039; comment, above, is very tastefully understated.  Which Ken at Popehat sometimes does, but Clark, never.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/09/californias-unruh-act-provokes-outrage-its-invoked-by-the-wrong-people/comment-page-1/#comment-327388">Scott Jacobs</a>.</p>
<p>Mr. Jacobs&#8217; comment, above, is very tastefully understated.  Which Ken at Popehat sometimes does, but Clark, never.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Scott Jacobs		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/09/californias-unruh-act-provokes-outrage-its-invoked-by-the-wrong-people/comment-page-1/#comment-327388</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Jacobs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2015 01:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=55147#comment-327388</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Ken at Popehat does not offer a warm outpouring of sympathy&lt;/blockquote&gt;In fairness, warm outpourings of sympathy aren&#039;t really a thing the fine, fine folks at Popehat do...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Ken at Popehat does not offer a warm outpouring of sympathy</p></blockquote>
<p>In fairness, warm outpourings of sympathy aren&#8217;t really a thing the fine, fine folks at Popehat do&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jim Collins		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/09/californias-unruh-act-provokes-outrage-its-invoked-by-the-wrong-people/comment-page-1/#comment-327386</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Collins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2015 20:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=55147#comment-327386</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I was reading the comments at Popehat.  It seems to me that as long as the Unruh Act is used to smack down the right people all is fine and well.  As soon as it is used against a &quot;protected class&quot; it is evil and the people using it should be throw in jail.

I wonder how many people commenting that the two men were wrong, support the gay couple that put the bakery out of business for not making a cake for a gay couple?

Discrimination is a double edged sword.  Last year a belligerent homosexual annoyed me to the point of violence.   When I pushed him away and told him to leave me alone, he pretty much told me that if I slugged him, he would sue me for discrimination because he was gay.  He sat down and shut up when I answered back that if I didn&#039;t slug him when I would have slugged a straight guy, that would be discrimination too and I was willing to take my chances with a Judge.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was reading the comments at Popehat.  It seems to me that as long as the Unruh Act is used to smack down the right people all is fine and well.  As soon as it is used against a &#8220;protected class&#8221; it is evil and the people using it should be throw in jail.</p>
<p>I wonder how many people commenting that the two men were wrong, support the gay couple that put the bakery out of business for not making a cake for a gay couple?</p>
<p>Discrimination is a double edged sword.  Last year a belligerent homosexual annoyed me to the point of violence.   When I pushed him away and told him to leave me alone, he pretty much told me that if I slugged him, he would sue me for discrimination because he was gay.  He sat down and shut up when I answered back that if I didn&#8217;t slug him when I would have slugged a straight guy, that would be discrimination too and I was willing to take my chances with a Judge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
