<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Cato&#8217;s Constitution Day Sept. 17	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/09/catos-constitution-day-sept-17/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/09/catos-constitution-day-sept-17/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2015 19:11:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: mx		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/09/catos-constitution-day-sept-17/comment-page-1/#comment-327198</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mx]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2015 19:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=55055#comment-327198</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Can we also discuss the absurdity of Constitution Day as a federally mandated holiday (I certainly have no argument against private occasions on whatever day to study and/or celebrate the Constitution) wherein appropriate events must be arranged by every federally funded educational institution ranging from the local elementary school to vocational institutes for future hairstylists or airplane mechanics? We could talk about how its genesis was tucked into a 3,000 page appropriations bill or how Constitution Day itself is arguably &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/17/opinion/constitution-day-happy-illegal-holiday.html?_r=0&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;unconstutitonal&lt;/a&gt;. 

It is certainly not within the spirit of the Constitution that Congress in Washington DC would prescribe a specific topic of study to be taught on a particular day to legal adults at, say, a culinary academy in California.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can we also discuss the absurdity of Constitution Day as a federally mandated holiday (I certainly have no argument against private occasions on whatever day to study and/or celebrate the Constitution) wherein appropriate events must be arranged by every federally funded educational institution ranging from the local elementary school to vocational institutes for future hairstylists or airplane mechanics? We could talk about how its genesis was tucked into a 3,000 page appropriations bill or how Constitution Day itself is arguably <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/17/opinion/constitution-day-happy-illegal-holiday.html?_r=0" rel="nofollow">unconstutitonal</a>. </p>
<p>It is certainly not within the spirit of the Constitution that Congress in Washington DC would prescribe a specific topic of study to be taught on a particular day to legal adults at, say, a culinary academy in California.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Workplace religious accommodation, cont&#039;d - Overlawyered		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/09/catos-constitution-day-sept-17/comment-page-1/#comment-327192</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Workplace religious accommodation, cont&#039;d - Overlawyered]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2015 12:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=55055#comment-327192</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] filed under Kentucky&#8217;s state Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA). And at Cato&#8217;s Constitution Day on September 17 I&#8217;ll be discussing my forthcoming piece on EEOC v. Abercrombie &#038; Fitch, the [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] filed under Kentucky&#8217;s state Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA). And at Cato&#8217;s Constitution Day on September 17 I&#8217;ll be discussing my forthcoming piece on EEOC v. Abercrombie &#038; Fitch, the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
