<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: September 2 roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/09/september-2-roundup-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/09/september-2-roundup-5/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2015 01:42:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Fox2!		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/09/september-2-roundup-5/comment-page-1/#comment-327185</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fox2!]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2015 01:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=54768#comment-327185</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I wonder how the National Pork Board would feel about an ad campaign for long pig: &quot;the other, other white meat&quot;?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how the National Pork Board would feel about an ad campaign for long pig: &#8220;the other, other white meat&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bill Poser		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/09/september-2-roundup-5/comment-page-1/#comment-327126</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill Poser]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 17:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=54768#comment-327126</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The most absurd thing about the Waltzing Matilda dispute is that a song whose lyrics were published in 1902 and whose melody followed soon after should still be in copyright 113 years later. This obviously provides no benefit to the original authors.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most absurd thing about the Waltzing Matilda dispute is that a song whose lyrics were published in 1902 and whose melody followed soon after should still be in copyright 113 years later. This obviously provides no benefit to the original authors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
